Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 85
Filtrar
1.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 59(1): 26-30, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2281430

RESUMEN

Among the objectives of the WHO Global Vaccination Action Plan 2020-2025, there is the establishment, in all countries, of a National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG), an independent body with the aim of supporting and harmonising vaccination policies. Italy firstly established a NITAG in 2017; it contributed to the nation's immunization policies but fell short of its goal of becoming a true reference group. The newly appointed NITAG, made up of 28 independent experts, has the ambitious goal to promote the new National Immunization Prevention Plan (PNPV), to harmonise the current vaccination schedule with the anti-COVID-19 campaign, and to recover the vaccination coverage decline that occurred during the pandemic. The contact with the ECDC EU/EEA, the WHO Global NITAG networks, and all the national stakeholders needs to be reinforced in order to accomplish these aims. This paper describes the structure, organisation, and strategy of the new Italian NITAG.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos , COVID-19 , Programas de Inmunización , Vacunación Masiva , Comités Consultivos/historia , Comités Consultivos/organización & administración , Italia/epidemiología , Programas de Inmunización/ética , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Programas de Inmunización/normas , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Historia del Siglo XXI , Objetivos , Vacunación Masiva/ética , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , Vacunación Masiva/normas , Vacunación Masiva/tendencias , Conflicto de Intereses , Humanos
2.
J Fam Pract ; 70(2): 86;89;92, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1148373
5.
Lancet ; 399(10325): 678-690, 2022 02 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1721141

RESUMEN

Measles is a highly contagious, potentially fatal, but vaccine-preventable disease caused by measles virus. Symptoms include fever, maculopapular rash, and at least one of cough, coryza, or conjunctivitis, although vaccinated individuals can have milder or even no symptoms. Laboratory diagnosis relies largely on the detection of specific IgM antibodies in serum, dried blood spots, or oral fluid, or the detection of viral RNA in throat or nasopharyngeal swabs, urine, or oral fluid. Complications can affect many organs and often include otitis media, laryngotracheobronchitis, pneumonia, stomatitis, and diarrhoea. Neurological complications are uncommon but serious, and can occur during or soon after the acute disease (eg, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis) or months or even years later (eg, measles inclusion body encephalitis and subacute sclerosing panencephalitis). Patient management mainly involves supportive therapy, such as vitamin A supplementation, monitoring for and treatment of secondary bacterial infections with antibiotics, and rehydration in the case of severe diarrhoea. There is no specific antiviral therapy for the treatment of measles, and disease control largely depends on prevention. However, despite the availability of a safe and effective vaccine, measles is still endemic in many countries and causes considerable morbidity and mortality, especially among children in resource-poor settings. The low case numbers reported in 2020, after a worldwide resurgence of measles between 2017 and 2019, have to be interpreted cautiously, owing to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on disease surveillance. Disrupted vaccination activities during the pandemic increase the potential for another resurgence of measles in the near future, and effective, timely catch-up vaccination campaigns, strong commitment and leadership, and sufficient resources will be required to mitigate this threat.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedades Endémicas/prevención & control , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , Vacuna Antisarampión/administración & dosificación , Sarampión/prevención & control , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/organización & administración , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/normas , Enfermedades Endémicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Vacunación Masiva/normas , Vacunación Masiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/inmunología , Sarampión/virología , Virus del Sarampión/inmunología , Virus del Sarampión/patogenicidad , Pandemias/prevención & control
7.
S Afr Med J ; 112(2): 13501, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1679055

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In South Africa (SA), >2.4 million cases of COVID­19 and >72 000 deaths were recorded between March 2020 and 1 August 2021, affecting the country's 52 districts to various extents. SA has committed to a COVID­19 vaccine roll-out in three phases, prioritising frontline workers, the elderly, people with comorbidities and essential workers. However, additional actions will be necessary to support efficient allocation and equitable access for vulnerable, access-constrained communities. OBJECTIVES: To explore various determinants of disease severity, resurgence risk and accessibility in order to aid an equitable, effective vaccine roll-out for SA that would maximise COVID­19 epidemic control by reducing the number of COVID­19 transmissions and resultant deaths, while at the same time reducing the risk of vaccine wastage. METHODS: For the 52 districts of SA, 26 COVID­19 indicators such as hospital admissions, deaths in hospital and mobility were ranked and hierarchically clustered with cases to identify which indicators can be used as indicators for severity or resurgence risk. Districts were then ranked using the estimated COVID­19 severity and resurgence risk to assist with prioritisation of vaccine roll-out. Urban and rural accessibility were also explored as factors that could limit vaccine roll-out in hard-to-reach communities. RESULTS: Highly populated urban districts showed the most cases. Districts such as Buffalo City, City of Cape Town and Nelson Mandela Bay experienced very severe first and second waves of the pandemic. Districts with high mobility, population size and density were found to be at highest risk of resurgence. In terms of accessibility, we found that 47.2% of the population are within 5 km of a hospital with ≥50 beds, and this percentage ranged from 87.0% in City of Cape Town to 0% in Namakwa district. CONCLUSIONS: The end goal is to provide equal distribution of vaccines proportional to district populations, which will provide fair protection. Districts with a high risk of resurgence and severity should be prioritised for vaccine roll-out, particularly the major metropolitan areas. We provide recommendations for allocations of different vaccine types for each district that consider levels of access, numbers of doses and cold-chain storage capability.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , Gravedad del Paciente , Sudáfrica , Poblaciones Vulnerables
14.
Am J Public Health ; 111(10): 1780-1783, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1416983

RESUMEN

Individuals with serious mental illness are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. The New York State (NYS) Office of Mental Health implemented patient and staff rapid testing, quarantining, and vaccination to limit COVID-19 spread in 23 state-operated psychiatric hospitals between November 2020 and February 2021. COVID-19 infection rates in inpatients and staff decreased by 96% and 71%, respectively, and the NYS population case rate decreased by 6%. Repeated COVID-19 testing and vaccination should be priority interventions for state-operated psychiatric hospitals. (Am J Public Health. 2021;111(10):1780-1783. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306444).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , New York/epidemiología , Cuarentena , SARS-CoV-2 , Poblaciones Vulnerables
15.
Am J Public Health ; 111(10): 1776-1779, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1403353

RESUMEN

We describe a large-scale collaborative intervention of practice measures and COVID-19 vaccine administration to college students in the priority 1b group, which included Black or Indigenous persons and other persons of color. In February 2021, at this decentralized vaccine distribution site at Montana State University in Bozeman, we administered 806 first doses and 776 second doses by implementing an interprofessional effort with personnel from relevant university units, including facilities management, student health, communications, administration, and academic units (e.g., nursing, medicine, medical assistant program, and engineering). (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print September 9, 2021:1776-1779. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306435).


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , Universidades/organización & administración , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/etnología , Docentes , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Montana/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudiantes , Adulto Joven
16.
World J Emerg Surg ; 16(1): 46, 2021 09 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1403246

RESUMEN

On January 2020, the WHO Director General declared that the outbreak constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The world has faced a worldwide spread crisis and is still dealing with it. The present paper represents a white paper concerning the tough lessons we have learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, an international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making. With the present paper, international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Salud Global , Pandemias , Investigación Biomédica , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Política de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , Pandemias/prevención & control , Política , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Telemedicina/organización & administración
17.
Med J Aust ; 215(9): 427-432, 2021 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1389702

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination by vaccine type, age group eligibility, vaccination strategy, and population coverage. DESIGN: Epidemiologic modelling to assess the final size of a COVID-19 epidemic in Australia, with vaccination program (Pfizer, AstraZeneca, mixed), vaccination strategy (vulnerable first, transmitters first, untargeted), age group eligibility threshold (5 or 15 years), population coverage, and pre-vaccination effective reproduction number ( Reffv¯ ) for the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant as factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of SARS-CoV-2 infections; cumulative hospitalisations, deaths, and years of life lost. RESULTS: Assuming Reffv¯ = 5, the current mixed vaccination program (vaccinating people aged 60 or more with the AstraZeneca vaccine and people under 60 with the Pfizer vaccine) will not achieve herd protection unless population vaccination coverage reaches 85% by lowering the vaccination eligibility age to 5 years. At Reffv¯ = 3, the mixed program could achieve herd protection at 60-70% population coverage and without vaccinating 5-15-year-old children. At Reffv¯ = 7, herd protection is unlikely to be achieved with currently available vaccines, but they would still reduce the number of COVID-19-related deaths by 85%. CONCLUSION: Vaccinating vulnerable people first is the optimal policy when population vaccination coverage is low, but vaccinating more socially active people becomes more important as the Reffv¯ declines and vaccination coverage increases. Assuming the most plausible Reffv¯ of 5, vaccinating more than 85% of the population, including children, would be needed to achieve herd protection. Even without herd protection, vaccines are highly effective in reducing the number of deaths.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Inmunidad Colectiva , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Australia/epidemiología , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/virología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Niño , Preescolar , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Vacunación Masiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Inmunológicos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Cobertura de Vacunación/organización & administración , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA